^rgl RanGTP

Fig. 5. Current models of translocation through the nuclear pore complex. (A) The virtual gating model of Rout et al. (12); (B1) the model of Stewart et al. (111); (B2) the oily spaghetti model of Macara (8); (B3) the affinity gradient model of Ben-Efraim and Gerace (112); and (C) the selective phase model of Ribbeck and Gorlich (67). (A) From ref. 12, © 2003, with permission from Elsevier; (B1) from ref. 111; (B2) from ref. 8 with permission; (B3) from ref. 112, with permission from The Rockefeller University Press; (C) from ref. 67 (http://www.nature.com).

In the "virtual gating model" (Fig. 5A) it is assumed (12,52) that the NPC contains a large patent channel of approx 50 nm diameter. The channel entrance but not the channel wall is thought to be decorated with a large number of small flexible protein filaments carrying an abundance of binding sites, i.e. FG motifs. The channel would constitute a large energy barrier for the translocation of inert molecules, even if they are much smaller than the channel diameter. In addition, the small, flexible FG repeat containing filaments would push away inert molecules by thermal motion. In contrast, transport receptors or transport complexes which would be concentrated at the channel entrance by binding to FG repeats. This would reduce the energy barrier for entering the channel and thus enhance translocation. Experimentally, little is known about the distribution of FG motifs along the axis of the NPC. Data we have obtained by immunogold electron microscopy (118) and by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy (119) suggest that binding sites of transport receptors occur all along the NPC axis. Deletion experiments have shown (56) that in yeast the FG motifs of asymmetric nucleoporins can be completely removed without compromising growth properties.

Stewart et al. (111,120) also assume that the NPC contains a large channel. However, in their model (Fig. 5B1) binding sites (i.e. FG repeats) are distributed along the complete transport pathway, that is, from the tips of the cytoplasmic filaments throughout the channel down to the nuclear basket. An import complex, for instance, would bind to FG repeats of the cytoplasmic filaments, jump from one FG repeat to the next, and thus pass through the central channel. In arriving in the nuclear basket, it would encounter RanGTP and dissociate. Similarly, in the "oily-spaghetti model" (8) (Fig. 5B2) the wall of the central channel is decorated with a loose and highly flexible meshwork of FG repeats. The filaments extend into the channel lumen but leave free a diffusion tube approx 10 nm in diameter. Thus, the passage of inert molecules would be restricted to the diffusion tube but transport receptors and transport complexes would be able to use the complete cross section of the channel because of their affinity for FG repeats.

Ben-Efraim and Gerace (112) found that the nucleoporins vNup358, vNup62, and vNup153, which localize to cytoplasmic filament, central scaffold, and nuclear basket, respectively, display increasing affinities for karyopherin P1. They suggested that the gradient of increasing affinity found in vitro using purified proteins also exists in vivo. Thus (Fig. 5B3), import complexes would be handed over from a nucleoporin with a lower affinity to an neighboring nucleoporin with higher affinity until they arrive in the nuclear basket where they are dissociated by interaction with RanGTP. Recent experiments (121) in which the FG domains of asymmetric cytoplasmic and nuclear yeast nucleoporins were either deleted or exchanged did not revealed, however, any effect of these modifications on transport.

In the selective-phase model (67) the NPC contains a large channel which is occluded by a gel. That gel is thought to be formed by FG domains such that the hydrophobic FG motifs interact with each other to yield "knots" while the hydrophilic linker sequences provide the connections between knots. To permeate through the NPC inert molecules would have to slip through the rather small meshes of the gel. In contrast, transport receptors and transport complexes would be able to interact with FG motifs and thus to temporarily open the knots . In accordance with the model small

Fig. 6. Reduction-of-dimensionality model of translocation through the nuclear pore complex. (A) The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is assumed to contain a large channel. The channel wall is lined with phenylalanine glycine (FG) motifs (i.e., binding sites for nuclear transport receptors). FG repeats form a surface that extends onto filaments. (B) The channel wall is decorated with a loose network of unfolded hydrophilic peptide chains, here referred to selectivity filter. The selectivity filter is very gentle and flexible. (C) Inert molecules, which do not bind to FG motifs, permeate the pore by diffusion in the aqueous phase. The selectivity filter restricts the passage to an inner tube with a diameter of 5 to 10 nm. (D) Transport complexes, which consist of a nuclear signal containing cargo and a nuclear transport receptor, first bind to FG motifs on filaments and then search the FG surface by a 2D random walk for the site with highest affinity. From ref. 116.

Fig. 6. Reduction-of-dimensionality model of translocation through the nuclear pore complex. (A) The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is assumed to contain a large channel. The channel wall is lined with phenylalanine glycine (FG) motifs (i.e., binding sites for nuclear transport receptors). FG repeats form a surface that extends onto filaments. (B) The channel wall is decorated with a loose network of unfolded hydrophilic peptide chains, here referred to selectivity filter. The selectivity filter is very gentle and flexible. (C) Inert molecules, which do not bind to FG motifs, permeate the pore by diffusion in the aqueous phase. The selectivity filter restricts the passage to an inner tube with a diameter of 5 to 10 nm. (D) Transport complexes, which consist of a nuclear signal containing cargo and a nuclear transport receptor, first bind to FG motifs on filaments and then search the FG surface by a 2D random walk for the site with highest affinity. From ref. 116.

alcohols that perturb hydrophobic interactions were found to cause a large increase in the passive permeability of the NPC (122).

Results obtained by optical transport measurements (16) and single-molecule fluorescence microscopy (119) prompted us suggested a translocation model (116) in which the enhancement of transport by binding is accounted for by the fundamental differences (123) existing between diffusion in two and three dimensions. In the model (Fig. 6) it is assumed that the wall of the channel traversing the NPC is covered with a dense array of FG motifs forming one, coherent hydrophobic surface. The FG surface is thought to continue on cytoplasmic filaments and on parts of the nuclear filaments (Fig. 6A). In addition to the FG surface, the model includes a loose network of flexible, hydrophilic, possibly glycosylated peptide chains decorating the central part of the channel wall (Fig. 6B). The loose network extends into the pore lumen but leaves free a central tube with a approx 10-nm diameter.

Inert molecules (Fig. 6C) are thought to permeate the NPC by diffusing through the inner water-filled central tube. In contrast, transport receptors and transport complexes (Fig. 6D) would bind to the FG surface on filaments and then rapidly search the FG surface for the channel exit by a two-dimensional random walk . At the exit the transport complexes would encounter either RanGTP (import) or RanBP and RanGAP and thus be dissociated. Further properties, implications, and predictions of the model are discussed elsewhere (116).

5. Concluding Remarks

The elucidation of nucleocytoplasmic transport has made tremendous progress. Excitingly, the full power of the eukaryotic building plan, segregating genetic material from protein synthesis, is in gradual disclosure. Better understanding of nucleo-cytoplasmic transport will have important implications for both medicine and biotechnology. Already, the role of nucleocytoplasmic transport in the biogenesis of pathological conditions and the possibilities for new therapeutic strategies are intensively studied. Apart from this, the NPC provides an intriguing paradigm for a molecular machine able to sort native protein molecules at high speed.


1 Callan, H. G., Randall, J. T. and Tomlin, S. G. (1949) An electron microscope study of the nuclear membrane. Nature 163, 280.

2 Hutchison, C. J. (2002) Lamins: building blocks or regulators of gene expression? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 848-858.

3 Kau, T. R., Way, J. C. and Silver, P. A. (2004) Nuclear transport and cancer: from mechanism to intervention. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 106-117.

4 Smith, J. M. and Koopman, P. A. (2004) The ins and outs of transcriptional control: nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in development and disease. Trends Genet. 20, 4-8.

5 Mounkes, L., Kozlov, S., Burke, B. and Stewart, C. L. (2003) The laminopathies: nuclear structure meets disease. Curr. Op. Genet. Dev. 13, 223-230.

6. Cronshaw, J. M. and Matunis, M. J. (2004) The nuclear pore complex: disease associations and functional correlations. Trends Endocrinol. Metabol. 15, 34-39.

7 Gorlich, D. and Mattaj, I. W. (1996) Protein kinesis-Nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science 271, 1513-1518.

8 Macara, I. G. (2001) Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 570-594.

9 Weis, K. (2003) Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell 112, 441-451.

10 Bednenko, J., Cingolani, G. and Gerace, L. (2003) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: navigating the channel. Traffic 4, 127-135.

11 Fahrenkrog, B. and Aebi, U. (2003) The nuclear pore complex: Nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 757-766.

12 Rout, M. P., Aitchison, J. D., Magnasco, M. O. and Chait, B. T. (2003) Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 622-628.

13 Cullen, B. R. (2003) Nuclear RNA export. J. Cell Sci. 116, 587-597.

14 Fried, H. and Kutay, U. (2003) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60, 1659-1688.

15 Suntharalingam, M. and Wente, S. R. (2003) Peering through the pore: Nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. Dev. Cell 4, 775-789.

16. Peters, R. (2003) Optical single transporter recording: Transport kinetics in microarrays of membrane patches. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 47-67.

17 Peters, R., Lang, I., Scholz, M., Schulz, B. and Kayne, F. (1986) Fluorescence Microphotolysis to Measure Nucleocytoplasmic Transport In vivo and In vitro. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 14, 821-822.

18 Nelson, W. G., Pienta, K. J., Barrack, E. R. and Coffey, D. S. (1986) The Role of the Nuclear Matrix in the Organization and Function of DNA. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophysic. Chem. 15, 457-475.

19 Pederson, T. (2000) Half a century of "the nuclear matrix". Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 799-805.

20 Peters, R. (1986) Fluorescence Microphotolysis to Measure Nucleocytoplasmic Transport and Intracellular Mobility. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 864, 305-359.

21 Luby-Phelps, K. (2000) Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: Volume, viscosity. diffusion, intracellular surface area. International Review of Cytology-A Survey of Cell Biology, Vol 192 192, 189-221.

22 Verkman, A. S. (2002) Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 27-33.

23 Misteli, T. (2001) Nuclear structure-Protein dynamics: Implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science 291, 843-847.

24 Kues, T., Peters, R. and Kubitscheck, U. (2001) Visualization and tracking of single protein molecules in the cell nucleus. Biophys. J. 80, 2954-2967.

25 Kues, T., Dickmanns, A., Luhrmann, R., Peters, R. and Kubitscheck, U. (2001) High intranuclear mobility and dynamic clustering of the splicing factor U1 snRNP observed by single particle tracking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12021-12026.

26 Singh, O. P., Bjorkroth, B., Masich, S., Wieslander, L. and Daneholt, B. (1999) The intranuclear movement of Balbiani ring premessenger ribonucleoprotein particles. Exp. Cell Res. 251, 135-146.

27 Politz, J. C. R., Tuft, R. A. and Pederson, T. (2003) Diffusion-based transport of nascent ribosomes in the nucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4805-4812.

28 Lamb, M. M. and Daneholt, B. (1979) Characterization of Active Transcription Units in Balbiani Rings of Chironomus Tentans. Cell 17, 835-848.

29 Andersson, K., Bjorkroth, B. and Daneholt, B. (1980) The Insitu Structure of the Active 75-S Rna Genes in Balbiani Rings of Chironomus-Tentans. Exp. Cell Res. 130, 313-326.

30 Skoglund, U., Andersson, K., Strandberg, B. and Daneholt, B. (1986) 3-Dimensional Structure of A Specific Pre-Messenger Rnp Particle Established by Electron-Microscope Tomography. Nature 319, 560-564.

31 Mehlin, H., Daneholt, B. and Skoglund, U. (1992) Translocation of a Specific Premessenger Ribonucleoprotein Particle Through the Nuclear-Pore Studied with Electron-Microscope Tomography. Cell 69, 605-613.

32 Franke, W. W. and Scheer, U. (1974) Structures and functions of the nuclear envelope. Cell Nucleus 1, 219-347.

33 Doring, V. and Stick, R. (1990) Gene Structure of Nuclear Lamin-Liii of Xenopus-Laevis-A Model for the Evolution of If Proteins from A Lamin-Like Ancestor. EMBO J. 9, 4073-4081.

34 Aebi, U., Cohn, J., Buhle, L. and Gerace, L. (1986) The Nuclear Lamina Is A Meshwork of Intermediate-Type Filaments. Nature 323, 560-564.

35 Smythe, C., Jenkins, H. E. and Hutchison, C. J. (2000) Incorporation of the nuclear pore basket protein Nup 153 into nuclear pore structures is dependent upon lamina assembly: evidence from cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. EMBO J. 19, 3918-3931.

36 Senior, A. and Gerace, L. (1988) Integral Membrane-Proteins Specific to the Inner Nuclear-Membrane and Associated with the Nuclear Lamina. J. Cell Biol. 107, 20292036.

37. Jagatheesan, G., Thanumalayan, S., Muralikrishna, B., Rangaraj, N., Karande, A. A. and Parnaik, V. K. (1999) Colocalization of intranuclear lamin foci with RNA splicing factors. J. Cell Sci. 112, 4651-4661.

38 Stick, R. and Hausen, P. (1985) Changes in the Nuclear Lamina Composition During Early Development of Xenopus-Laevis. Cell 41, 191-200.

39 Maul, G. G. (1977) The nuclear and cytoplasmic pore complex: Structure, dynamics, distribution, and evolution. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl. 6, 76-187.

40 Akey, C. W. (1989) Interactions and Structure of the Nuclear-Pore Complex Revealed by Cryo-Electron Microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 109, 955-970.

41 Goldberg, M. W. and Allen, T. D. (1993) The Nuclear-Pore Complex-3-Dimensional Surface-Structure Revealed by Field-Emission, In-Lens Scanning Electron-Microscopy, with Underlying Structure Uncovered by Proteolysis. J. Cell Sci. 106, 261-274.

42 Allen, T. D., Cronshaw, J. M., Bagley, S., Kiseleva, E. and Goldberg, M. W. (2000) The nuclear pore complex: mediator of translocation between nucleus and cytoplasm. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1651-1659.

43 Scheer, U., Dabauvalle, M. C., Merkert, H. and Benavente, R. (1988) The nuclear envelope and the organization of the pore complex. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 12, 669-689.

44 Unwin, P. N. T. and Milligan, R. A. (1982) A Large Particle Associated with the Perimeter of the Nuclear-Pore Complex. J. Cell Biol. 93, 63-75.

45 Akey, C. W. and Radermacher, M. (1993) Architecture of the Xenopus Nuclear Pore Complex Revealed by 3-Dimensional Cryoelectron Microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1-19.

46 Stoffler, D., Feja, B., Fahrenkrog, B., Walz, J., Typke, D. and Aebi, U. (2003) Cryoelectron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: Implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. J. Mol. Biol. 328, 119-130.

47 Akey, C. W. (1990) Visualization of Transport-Related Configurations of the Nuclear-Pore Transporter. Biophys. J. 58, 341-355.

48 Kiseleva, E., Goldberg, M. W., Allen, T. D. and Akey, C. W. (1998) Active nuclear pore complexes in Chironomus: visualization of transporter configurations related to mRNP export. J. Cell Sci. 111, 223-236.

49 Beck, M., Forster, F., Ecke, M., et al. (2004) Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306, 1387-1390.

50 Rout, M. P. and Blobel, G. (1993) Isolation of the Yeast Nuclear-Pore Complex. J. Cell Biol. 123, 771-783.

51 Miller, B. R., Powers, M., Park, M., Fischer, W. and Forbes, D. J. (2000) Identification of a new vertebrate nucleoporin, Nup188, with the use of a novel organelle trap assay. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3381-3396.

52 Rout, M. P., Aitchison, J. D., Suprapto, A., Hjertaas, K., Zhao, Y. M. and Chait, B. T. (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: Composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148, 635-651.

53 Cronshaw, J. A., Krutchinsky, A. N., Zhang, W. Z., Chait, B. T. and Matunis, M. J. (2002) Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 158, 915-927.

54 Yang, Q., Rout, M. P. and Akey, C. W. (1998) Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: Functional and evolutionary implications. Mol. Cell 1, 223-234.

55 Reichelt, R., Holzenburg, A., Buhle, E. L., Jarnik, M., Engel, A. and Aebi, U. (1990) Correlation Between Structure and Mass-Distribution of the Nuclear-Pore Complex and of Distinct Pore Complex Components. J. Cell Biol. 110, 883-894.

56 Strawn, L. A., Shen, T. X., Shulga, N., Goldfarb, D. S. and Wente, S. R. (2004) Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 197-206.

57 Denning, D. P., Patel, S. S., Uversky, V., Fink, A. L. and Rexach, M. (2003) Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2450-2455.

58 Powers, M. A. and Dasso, M. (2004) Nuclear transport erupts on the slopes of Mount Etna. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 82-86.

59 Lutzmann, M., Kunze, R., Buerer, A., Aebi, U. and Hurt, E. (2002) Modular self-assembly of a Y-shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins. EMBO J. 21, 387-397.

60 Krull, S., Thyberg, J., Bjorkroth, B., Rackwitz, H. R. and Cordes, V. C. (2004) Nucleoporins as components of the nuclear pore complex core structure and Tpr as the architectural element of the nuclear basket. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4261-4277.

61 Fahrenkrog, B., Maco, B., Fager, A. M., et al. (2002) Domain-specific antibodies reveal multiple-site topology of Nup153 within the nuclear pore complex. J. Struct. Biol. 140, 254-267.

62 Devos, D., Dokudovskaya, S., Alber, F., et al. (2004) Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biol. 2, e380.

63 Paine, P. L., Moore, L. C. and Horowitz, S. B. (1975) Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature 254, 109-114.

64 Pappenheimer, J. R., Renkin, E. M. and Borrero, L. M. (1951) Filtration, Diffusion and Molecular Sieving Through Peripheral Capillary Membranes A Contribution to the Pore Theory of Capillary Permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 167, 13-46.

65 Renkin, E. M. and Curry, F. E. (1979) Transport of water and solutes across endothelium. In Transport Organs (Giebisch, G., ed), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-45.

66 Keminer, O., Siebrasse, J. P., Zerf, K. and Peters, R. (1999) Optical recording of signalmediated protein transport through single nuclear pore complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11,842-11,847.

67 Ribbeck, K. and Gorlich, D. (2001) Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 20, 1320-1330.

68 Siebrasse, J. P. and Peters, R. (2002) Rapid translocation of NTF2 through the nuclear pore of isolated nuclei and nuclear envelopes. EMBO Reports 3, 887-892.

69 Kalderon, D., Richardson, W. D., Markham, A. F. and Smith, A. E. (1984) Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus-40 large-T-antigen. Nature 311, 33-38.

70 Dingwall, C., Robbins, J., Dilworth, S. M., Roberts, B. and Richardson, W. D. (1988) The Nucleoplasmin nuclear location sequence is larger and more complex than that of Sv40 large T-antigen. J. Cell Biol. 107, 841-849.

71 Wen, W., Meinkoth, J. L., Tsien, R. Y. and Taylor, S. S. (1995) Identification of a signal for rapid export of proteins from the nucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 471.

72 Fischer, U., Huber, J., Boelens, W. C., Mattaj, I. W. and Luhrmann, R. (1995) The Hiv-1 Rev activation domain is a nuclear export signal that accesses an export pathway used by specific cellular RNAs. Cell 82, 475-483.

73 Michael, W. M., Choi, M. Y. and Dreyfuss, G. (1995) A nuclear export signal in hnRNP a1-a signal-mediated, temperature-dependent nuclear-protein export pathway. Cell 83, 415-422.

74 Nair, R., Carter, P. and Rost, B. (2003) NLSdb: database of nuclear localization signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 397-399.

75. Gorlich, D. and Kutay, U. (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 607-660.

76 Chook, Y. M. and Blobel, G. (2001) Karyopherins and nuclear import. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 703-715.

77 Conti, E. and Izaurralde, E. (2001) Nucleocytoplasmic transport enters the atomic age. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 310-319.

78 Andrade, M. A. and Bork, P. (1995) Heat repeats in the Huntingtons-disease protein. Nat. Genet. 11, 115-116.

79 Fukuhara, N., Fernandez, E., Ebert, J., Conti, E. and Svergun, D. (2004) Conformational variability of nucleo-cytoplasmic transport factors. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2176-2181.

80 Fornerod, M., Ohno, M., Yoshida, M. and Mattaj, I. W. (1997) CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 90, 1051-1060.

81 Vetter, I. R. and Wittinghofer, A. (2001) Signal transduction-The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. Science 294, 1299-1304.

82 Matunis, M. J., Wu, J. A. and Blobel, G. (1998) SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140, 499-509.

83 Gorlich, D., Pante, N., Kutay, U., Aebi, U. and Bischoff, F. R. (1996) Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. EMBO J. 15, 55845594.

84 Kalab, P., Weis, K. and Heald, R. (2002) Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts. Science 295, 2452-2456.

85 Reed, R. and Hurt, E. (2002) A conserved rnRNA export machinery coupled to pre-mRNA splicing. Cell 108, 523-531.

86 Vinciguerra, P. and Stutz, F. (2004) MRNA export: an assembly line from genes to nuclear pores. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 285-292.

87 Dreyfuss, G., Kim, V. N. and Kataoka, N. (2002) Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 195-205.

88 Le Hir, H., Izaurralde, E., Maquat, L. E. and Moore, M. J. (2000) The spliceosome deposits multiple proteins 20-24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon-exon junctions. EMBO J. 19, 6860-6869.

89 Kataoka, N., Yong, J., Kim, V. N., et al. (2000) Pre-mRNA splicing imprints mRNA in the nucleus with a novel RNA-binding protein that persists in the cytoplasm. Mol. Cell 6, 673-682.

90 Gilbert, W. and Guthrie, C. (2004) The Glc7p nuclear phosphatase promotes mRNA export by facilitating association of Mex67p with mRNA. Mol. Cell 13, 201-212.

91 Izaurralde, E. (2004) Directing mRNA export. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 210-212.

92 Strasser, K. and Hurt, E. (2000) Yra1p, a conserved nuclear RNA-binding protein, interacts directly with Mex67p and is required for mRNA export. EMBO J. 19, 410-420.

93 Kang, Y. B. and Cullen, B. R. (1999) The human Tap protein is a nuclear mRNA export factor that contains novel RNA-binding and nucleocytoplasmic transport sequences. Genes Develop. 13, 1126-1139.

94 Rodriguez-Navarro, S., Fischer, T., Luo, M. J., et al. (2004) Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 116, 75-86.

95 Erkmann, J. A. and Kutay, U. (2004) Nuclear export of mRNA: from the site of transcription to the cytoplasm. Exp. Cell Res. 296, 12-20.

96 Katahira, J., Strasser, K., Podtelejnikov, A., Mann, M., Jung, J. U. and Hurt, E. (1999) The Mex67p-mediated nuclear mRNA export pathway is conserved from yeast to human. EMBO J. 18, 2593-2609.

97 Herold, A., Suyama, M., Rodrigues, J. P., et al. (2000) TAP (NXF1) belongs to a multigene family of putative RNA export factors with a conserved modular architecture. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8996-9008.

98 Black, B. E., Levesque, L., Holaska, J. M., Wood, T. C. and Paschal, B. M. (1999) Identification of an NTF2-related factor that binds Ran-GTP and regulates nuclear protein export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8616-8624.

99 Fribourg, S. and Conti, E. (2003) Structural similarity in the absence of sequence homology of the messenger RNA export factors Mtr2 and p15. EMBO Rep. 4, 699-703.

100 Liker, E., Fernandez, E., Izaurralde, E. and Conti, E. (2000) The structure of the mRNA export factor TAP reveals a cis arrangement of a non-canonical RNP domain and an LRR domain. EMBO J. 19, 5587-5598.

101 Ho, D. N., Coburn, G. A., Kang, Y. B., Cullen, B. R. and Georgiadis, M. M. (2002) The crystal structure and mutational analysis of a novel RNA-binding domain found in the human Tap nuclear mRNA export factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1888-1893.

102 Fribourg, S., Braun, I. C., Izaurralde, E. and Conti, E. (2001) Structural basis for the recognition of a nucleoporin FG repeat by the NTF2-like domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA nuclear export factor. Mol. Cell 8, 645-656.

103 Grant, R. P., Hurt, E., Neuhaus, D. and Stewart, M. (2002) Structure of the C-terminal FG-nucleoporin binding domain of Tap/NXF1. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 247-251.

104 Stutz, F. and Izaurralde, E. (2003) The interplay of nuclear mRNP assembly, mRNA surveillance and export. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 319-327.

105 Gruter, P., Tabernero, C., von Kobbe, C., et al. (1998) TAP, the human homolog of Mex67p, mediates CTE-dependent RNA export from the nucleus. Mol. Cell 1, 649-659.

106 Bullock, T. L., Clarkson, W. D., Kent, H. M. and Stewart, M. (1996) The 1.6 angstrom resolution crystal structure of nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) J. Mol. Biol. 260, 422-431.

107 Snay-Hodge, C. A., Colot, H. V., Goldstein, A. L. and Cole, C. N. (1998) Dbp5p/Rat8p is a yeast nuclear pore-associated DEAD-box protein essential for RNA export. EMBO J. 17, 2663-2676.

108 Maquat, L. E. (2004) Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: Splicing, translation and mRNP dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 89-99.

109 Rexach, M. and Blobel, G. (1995) Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83, 683-692.

110 Feldherr, C. M. and Akin, D. (1997) The location of the transport gate in the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Sci. 110, 3065-3070.

111 Bayliss, R., Corbett, A. H. and Stewart, M. (2000) The molecular mechanism of transport of macromolecules through nuclear pore complexes. Traffic 1, 448-456.

112 Ben-Efraim, I. and Gerace, L. (2001) Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J. Cell Biol. 152, 411-417.

113 Bickel, T. and Bruinsma, R. (2002) The nuclear pore complex mystery and anomalous diffusion in reversible gels. Biophys. J. 83, 3079-3087.

114 Kustanovich, T. and Rabin, Y. (2004) Metastable network model of protein transport through nuclear pores. Biophys. J. 86, 2008-2016.

115 Fahrenkrog, B., Koser, J. and Aebi, U. (2004) The nuclear pore complex: a jack of all trades? Trends Biochem. Sci. 29, 175-182.

116 Peters, R. (2005) Translocation through the nuclear pore complex: Selectivity and speed by reduction-of-dimensionality. Traffic 6, 421-427.

117 Shulga, N. and Goldfarb, D. S. (2003) Binding dynamics of structural nucleoporins govern nuclear pore complex permeability and may mediate channel gating. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 534-542.

118 Grote, M., Kubitscheck, U., Reichelt, R. and Peters, R. (1995) Mapping of Nucleoporins to the Center of the Nuclear-Pore Complex by Postembedding Immunogold Electron-Microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 108, 2963-2972.

119 Kubitscheck, U., Grunwald, D., Hoekstra, A., et al. (2005) Nuclear transport of single molecules: Dwell times at the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 168, 233-243.

120 Stewart, M., Baker, R. P., Bayliss, R., et al. (2001) Molecular mechanism of translocation through nuclear pore complexes during nuclear protein import. FEBS Lett. 498, 145-149.

121 Zeitler, B. and Weis, K. (2004) The FG-repeat asymmetry of the nuclear pore complex is dispensable for bulk nucleocytoplasmic transport in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 167, 583-590.

122 Ribbeck, K. and Gorlich, D. (2002) The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. EMBO J. 21, 2664-2671.

123 Berg, O. G. and von Hippel, P. H. (1985) Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 14, 131-160.

0 0

Post a comment